Hello,
I will try today to share my little experience on using Linux, the
distribution if have tested are:
Fedora
CentOS
Ubuntu
Debian
Ok,
first we will compare them with some facts, no personal opinions,
later I will let you know my preferences.
- Number of
packages available
Here
could be some errors specially because of the lot of repositories
each distribution may have, I will try to use only the most common
ones.
Fedora.- (Repositories enabled are: core, extras, updates, livna)
The
number of packages reported by yum list all command
is: 7334
CentOS.- (Repositories enabled are: kbs-CentOS-Extras, update,
rpmforge, base, contrib, addons, extras)
The number of packages reported by yum
list all command is: 5785
Ubuntu.- (Repositories enabled are: main, restricted, security,
universe, multiverse)
The number of packages reported by apt-cache stats command
is: 24088
Debian.- (Repositories enabled are: main, security)
The number of packages reported by apt-cache stats command
is: 23851
As we can see here Debian and Debian based Ubuntu has a lot more
packages available 4 to 5 times more! This are partial numbers as
the four distributions listed here, could have more repositories
enabled, but it is just to illustrate the difference in package
available.
Release Cycle
The release cycle is an important parameter if depending on what you
want, and what for you are going to use your Linux
We have two options with this four distributions we are studying
here.
One is the long cycle release.-
Pros.: You will have long time support for your applications, and
for all the packages, this is good if you need a lot of time to
configure and fine tune your system, and if you do not need the
latest applications versions.
Cons.: If you need a fresh release of any package for instance
MySQL or Apache, you will have to download and compile by
yourself, and also take care of the dependencies, (you may use
CentOSPlus repository or Backports for Debian), but anyway you
will normally have to wait until you have your system up to date
with all packages.
We have in this group:
CentOS: Which major releases are each 2 years more or less, with
partial releases in the middle
Debian: Which release cycle is also 2 (or even more) years, it is
famous for its “When it is ready” release cycle.
Ubuntu: Which release is every six moths but it now has LTS (Long
term support) edition, which actually is Dapper Drake
Two is the short cycle release.-
Pros.: You will count always with the latest versions of the
packages, always with an up to date system.
Cons.: You will have to update / upgrade your system too quickly
which could be time consuming, and difficult for companies which
need 24 hours up service, an upgrade always has its dangers. If
you stay with the old version and do not upgrade you could loose
security support and upgrades, and get exposed to hackers.
We have in this group:
Fedora: Which release cycle is each six moths more or less, with
no partial upgrades in the middle.
Ubuntu: Which release cycle is each six moths for its not LTS
versions.
We could see that Ubuntu has some of the two worlds, it has an LTS
version for those who need stability and a fast release cycle
version for those needing the latest version of packages in it's
systems, the rest you will have to choose according to your needs.
Upgrade difficult level.-
This is another topic I want to touch, this is more abstract than
the others but I will to my best to be concise.
Fedora:
Live upgrade: Not to easy not recommended, could cause problems to
your system
From the CDs: Easy to do, and the recommended option by everybody,
normally has no problems
From this we can see that if you have easy access to the CDs this
is a distribution good for you, as the upgrade comes from the CDs
CentOS:
Live upgrade: Not easy not recommended, could cause problems to
your system.
From de CDs: Easy to do, and the recommended option by everybody,
normally has no problems.
CentOS like Fedora is better upgraded from its installations CDs
with anaconda, so if you have easy access to the CDs once the new
version is released is a good option for you.
Debian:
Live upgrade: Really easy, apt-get or aptitude take care of
everything you just need to issue a command and your will system
will get upgraded.
From de CDs: I have never tested, but you can download the update
CDs to update your version to next one, or use jigdo to convert
your old image in the new one.
Ubuntu:
Live upgrade: As a Debian based Distro, ubuntu can be upgraded
from the command line with apt-get or aptitude
From de CDs: Once again as this distribution is based on Debian it
can be used jigdo to convert a previous release image into a new
one just downloading the .deb packages that have changed.
Debian and Ubuntu are more flexible for the upgrade than the RedHat
based ones like Fedora and CentOS.
Conclusions.-
From this small analysis I think you should think about this to make
your decision about which Distribution of Linux choose to work
(Remember there are more that 300 out there, I am only taking 4 of
them).
If you want to have the latest software available, like Compiz/Beryl
support the latest MySQL or PHP then you should go after Fedora or
Ubuntu on its non LTS version.
If you want to have the most tested / stable and do not care about
the versions of your packages, but prefer stability rather than the
latest versions, then your option is CentOS, Debian or Ubuntu LTS.
This apply for Servers and Desktop applications, it is up to you to
choose the one that fits your needs, it is also good to test some of
them before you go after one.
Note.- If you have a low resource machine you can look for:
Puppy Linux
Damn small Linux
Sabayon Linux
If your needs comes from an specific solution like
Firewall
Smoothwall
Ipcop
Disaster Recovery tools
Gparted (Good for partition)
Knoppix (Which is a Debian based Linux and one of the best Live
Distro out there)
Update: Hi, My friend from http://polishlinux.org, has this two excelent articles that are relevant to this topic.
Please read this articles.
Compare Distros
Distro quiz
Related Links:
CentOS
Debian
Fedora
Ubuntu
---------------------------------------------------
Damn Small Linux
Puppy Linux
Sabayon Linux
Gparted
Knoppix
Also If you want to see some Screenshots
Debian Installation
------------------------------------------------------------
And Screenshots of them running
Fedora: http://shots.linuxquestions.org/?linux_distribution_sm=Fedora%20Core%206
CentOS: http://shots.linuxquestions.org/?linux_distribution_sm=CentOS%205
Ubuntu: http://shots.linuxquestions.org/?linux_distribution_sm=Ubuntu%206.10
Debian: http://shots.linuxquestions.org/?linux_distribution_sm=Debian%20Etch%204.0
If this was useful for you, please consider making a donation, any amount is welcome, please proceed by clicking on the yellow donate button, thank you in advance.






I tried over 40 distros, first of all we use centos at our servers.You cant compare two different distros if one aims to desktop other to server.Otherwise good comparison.Also i was using gentoo at 1999 to 2003 and they have the fastest updated software pool (portage).You can see the packages in 15 mins after it is announced : )